ROHINI PRASAD vs KASTURCHAND

The Supreme Court examined the applicability of Sections 168, 169, and 190 of the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959, in determining Bhumiswami rights. The Court held that the appellant, Rohini Prasad, did not acquire Bhumiswami rights as the lease granted to him was not valid beyond one year under Section 168. The High Court's decision to affirm the trial court's decree for possession and mesne profits was upheld, confirming the respondent's entitlement to the land.