Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-07-26

Jagdishchandra Girjashanker vs Mohanbhai Hathibhai (Dead) Through ...

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2000 SC 107
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Jagdishchandra Girjashanker
Respondent
Mohanbhai Hathibhai (Dead) Through ...
Author
S.S.M. Quadri
Bench
S.S.M. Quadri

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Deputy Collector and the Revenue Tribunal regarding the restoration of possession of agricultural land under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. The Court clarified that the rights of the deceased tenant, Hathibhai, were not extinguished despite the order declaring the deemed purchase ineffective under Section 32G, and that his sons inherited tenancy rights under Section 40. The Court found that the landlord obtained possession otherwise than as per Section 29, justifying the restoration of possession to the tenant's son, Mohanbhai.

Jagdishchandra Girjashanker vs Mohanbhai Hathibhai (Dead) Through ... · Niyam