Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-07-20

Eskayef Now Known As Smithkline Beecham ... vs Commissioner Of Income Tax ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2000 SUPREME COURT 2567
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Eskayef Now Known As Smithkline Beecham ...
Respondent
Commissioner Of Income Tax ...
Bench
S.P.Bharucha, Ruma Pal

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the admissibility of surtax as a deduction in computing total income under the Income Tax Act, 1961, specifically referencing Section 37(3A). The Court held that the liability to pay surtax is not an admissible deduction, affirming the High Court's decision and the precedent set in Smith Kline and French (India) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, 219 ITR 581. The appeal was dismissed in favor of the Revenue, with no costs awarded.

Eskayef Now Known As Smithkline Beecham ... vs Commissioner Of Income Tax ... · Niyam