Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-07-10

Mohammed Asif vs State Crime Branch Cid

Citation / case number
2000(5)SCALE424
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Mohammed Asif
Respondent
State Crime Branch Cid
Author
U.C. Banerjee
Bench
U.C. Banerjee

Judgment text excerpt

The High Court of Madras addressed a petitioner's request for a certified copy of a tape-recorded witness deposition, which was claimed to contain errors. The court held that, in the interest of justice, the deposition should be compared with the tape-recording by a court official, despite the prosecution's view that it was unnecessary. The court ordered this comparison to be completed within one week, thereby ensuring accuracy in the trial records.

Mohammed Asif vs State Crime Branch Cid · Niyam