Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-01-21

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs NANDED-PARBHANI Z.L.B.M.V.OPERATOR SANGH

Citation / case number
SC 1999/11295
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Respondent
NANDED-PARBHANI Z.L.B.M.V.OPERATOR SANGH
Bench
G.B. PATTANAIK & U.C. BANERJEE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 207(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, the authority does not have the power to detain a vehicle solely for carrying more passengers than permitted by the conditions of the permit. The Court affirmed the Bombay High Court's ruling that such detention is unauthorized and illegal, thereby entitling the affected parties to compensation. The judgment clarified that only violations related to the area, route, or purpose of use of the vehicle could justify detention under the specified section.

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs NANDED-PARBHANI Z.L.B.M.V.OPERATOR SANGH · Niyam