Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-01-07

MAMMU vs HARI MOHAN

Citation / case number
SC 1997/4882
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MAMMU
Respondent
HARI MOHAN
Author
D.P.MOHAPATRO K.T.THOMAS
Bench
D.P.MOHAPATRO K.T.THOMAS

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision regarding the interpretation of 'kudikidappu' rights under Section 80-B of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963. The Court emphasized that the Appellate Authority must consider various factors, including the distance between structures and the nature of occupancy, before determining kudikidappu rights. The Court affirmed the High Court's finding that the appellant was not a kudikidappukaran, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

MAMMU vs HARI MOHAN · Niyam