Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-01-06

RANDHIR SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
SC 1997/15852
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RANDHIR SINGH
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Author
R.C.Lahoti S.R.Babu
Bench
R.C.Lahoti S.R.Babu

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court, while adjudicating a Writ Petition under Article 32, quashed the conviction of the petitioner under Section 193 IPC, following its earlier decision in Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 353 of 1997, which set aside a similar conviction due to non-compliance with procedural requirements under Section 195 Cr.P.C. and Section 340 Cr.P.C. The Court held that the punishment was invalid as it lacked original jurisdiction to try the offence. The petitioner, having served his sentence, was barred from claiming compensation or initiating further proceedings related to the conviction, except in departmental matters concerning his service.

RANDHIR SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA · Niyam