Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-02-15

MUMBAI AGRI.PRODUCE MKT.COMMTT. vs SHARAFATULLAH HAFIZ INAYATULLA

Citation / case number
SC 1999/9873
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MUMBAI AGRI.PRODUCE MKT.COMMTT.
Respondent
SHARAFATULLAH HAFIZ INAYATULLA
Author
SANTOSH HEGDE
Bench
A.P.Misra N.S.Hegde

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Bombay High Court's decision that the respondent had substantially complied with the norms for allotting galas for wholesale fruit trading as per the report by Justice Daud. The Court emphasized that the respondent's long-standing business activity and payment of market fees established his eligibility, despite the appellant's claim regarding the lack of a license during the relevant period. The Court affirmed the High Court's ruling, allowing the respondent to be granted a gala.

MUMBAI AGRI.PRODUCE MKT.COMMTT. vs SHARAFATULLAH HAFIZ INAYATULLA · Niyam