Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-02-07

STATE OF HARYANA vs MOHINDER SINGH

Citation / case number
SC 1999/5860
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF HARYANA
Respondent
MOHINDER SINGH
Author
D.P.WADHWA S.S.AHMAD
Bench
D.P.WADHWA S.S.AHMAD

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether a convict is entitled to remission of sentence for the period spent on bail, as per Section 432 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Court upheld the High Court's ruling that a convict, even when on bail, is entitled to remission, as the stigma of conviction remains. However, it clarified that convicts under Section 376 IPC are not eligible for remission as per the government circulars, which explicitly exclude such offenders from remission benefits. The Court directed the State Government to reconsider remission applications for convicts on bail, aligning with the principles established in the Punjab Jail Manual.

STATE OF HARYANA vs MOHINDER SINGH · Niyam