Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-02-15

Laxman Naskar vs Union Of India & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2000 SUPREME COURT 986
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Laxman Naskar
Respondent
Union Of India & Ors
Bench
G.T.Nanavati, S.N.Phukan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that life convicts do not have an inherent right to premature release but are entitled to have their cases considered under Article 161 of the Constitution and relevant state rules. The Court emphasized that the Government must adhere to its own guidelines when evaluating requests for premature release, particularly those outlined in Sub-rules (4) & (29) of Rule 591 of the West Bengal Rules. The rejection of the life convicts' petitions for premature release was found to be inconsistent with the established legal framework, leading to the conclusion that the Government failed to properly consider their cases.

Laxman Naskar vs Union Of India & Ors · Niyam