Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-02-08

Cheeranthoodika Ahmmedkutty And Anr vs Parambur Mariakutty Umma And Others

Citation / case number
AIR 2000 SUPREME COURT 1853
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Cheeranthoodika Ahmmedkutty And Anr
Respondent
Parambur Mariakutty Umma And Others
Bench
K.T. Thomas, D.P. Mohapatra

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 72-K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, a Certificate of Purchase is deemed conclusive proof of the assignment of rights to tenants, which should not be disregarded by the Taluk Land Board. The Court found that the High Court erred in not recognizing the legal implications of this provision, leading to the incorrect inclusion of certain lands in the excess land calculation of Moosakutty Haji. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, and the orders of the Taluk Land Board were set aside.

Cheeranthoodika Ahmmedkutty And Anr vs Parambur Mariakutty Umma And Others · Niyam