Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-02-08

R.Rathinam vs State By Dsp, District Crime Branch

Citation / case number
AIR 2000 SUPREME COURT 1851
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
R.Rathinam
Respondent
State By Dsp, District Crime Branch
Bench
K.T. Thomas, D.P. Mohapatra

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Madras High Court's Division Bench, which ruled that petitions filed by advocates seeking cancellation of bail were not maintainable as there existed a statutory remedy for the aggrieved parties. The Court emphasized that allowing such petitions would undermine the judicial process and flood the High Court with frivolous applications, thereby delaying genuine cases. The Court affirmed the principle that statutory provisions must be adhered to and that the competency of the Chief Justice to refer matters to a Division Bench is unquestionable.

R.Rathinam vs State By Dsp, District Crime Branch · Niyam