Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-02-16

State Of U.P vs Ashok Dixit And Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2000 SUPREME COURT 1066
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of U.P
Respondent
Ashok Dixit And Anr
Bench
G.T.Nanavati, S.N.Phukan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of the accused under Sections 302 and 307 IPC, emphasizing the necessity of corroborative evidence for the FIR, which was deemed unreliable due to the absence of the injured witness Munnu Singh. The Court reiterated that the prosecution must establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and in this case, the evidence presented was insufficient to sustain the conviction. The appeal by the State for enhancement of the sentence was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision.

State Of U.P vs Ashok Dixit And Anr · Niyam