Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-02-02

Bishwa Nath Aggarwal vs Meena Gupta And Ors.

Citation / case number
2001(1)ALD(CRI)199
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Bishwa Nath Aggarwal
Respondent
Meena Gupta And Ors.
Author
K.T. Thomas
Bench
K.T. Thomas, D.P. Mohapatra

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's conclusion that the statement made by the accused did not contain any inculpative admission, thus cannot be used against a co-accused under Section 30 of the Evidence Act. The Court found that the circumstantial evidence against the second accused, including a false alibi and a ransom note, was insufficient to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the innocence of the first accused based on her admission to the Magistrate, which was deemed self-exculpatory.

Bishwa Nath Aggarwal vs Meena Gupta And Ors. · Niyam