HAR NARAIN DAGA vs HEERALAL .

The Supreme Court upheld the eviction of the tenant under Section 13(1)(h) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950, affirming the landlord's bona fide personal necessity for the premises. The Court found that the concurrent findings of the trial court and appellate court regarding the landlord's need for the room for personal use and private coaching were justified. The Court also noted that the question of comparative hardship under Section 14 was not adequately considered by the lower courts, but ultimately upheld the eviction order based on the established bona fide necessity.