Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-12-04

K.R.Suraj vs The Excise Inspector, Parappananqadi & ...

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2000 SC 72
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
K.R.Suraj
Respondent
The Excise Inspector, Parappananqadi & ...
Author
Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri
Bench
S.N.Phukan, Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court granted leave to appeal in cases arising from the Kerala High Court's dismissal of petitions to quash proceedings initiated under Section 31 of the Kerala Abkari Act, 1077. The Court held that the Excise Inspector lacked authority to collect samples for prosecution under Section 57A prior to the 1997 amendment, rendering such prosecutions illegal. Consequently, the Court quashed the proceedings against the appellants, establishing that retrospective application of amended provisions without explicit legislative intent is impermissible.

K.R.Suraj vs The Excise Inspector, Parappananqadi & ... · Niyam