Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-12-07

U.P. State Electricity Board vs V.P. Dysel And Ors.

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2000 SC 231
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
U.P. State Electricity Board
Respondent
V.P. Dysel And Ors.
Author
S. Rajendra Babu
Bench
S. Rajendra Babu, S.N. Variava

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Labour Court's decision that the compulsory retirement of Vincent Paul Dysel at the age of 55 was unjustified, as he was classified as an inferior servant entitled to retire at 60 under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946, specifically referencing Section 13B. The Court found that the appellant's failure to contest the respondent's claim led to the Labour Court's conclusion being justified. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the Labour Court's award for the respondent's continued service until February 10, 1979.

U.P. State Electricity Board vs V.P. Dysel And Ors. · Niyam