Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-12-15

Babu Kuttan R.Pillai & Anr vs State Of Maharashtra

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2000 SC 166
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Babu Kuttan R.Pillai & Anr
Respondent
State Of Maharashtra
Author
D.P. Mohapatra
Bench
S.S.M.Quadri, D.P. Mohapatra

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the convictions under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987, and various sections of the Indian Penal Code, including Section 120-B IPC, for criminal conspiracy and threats to extort money from a construction company. The Court emphasized that the actions of the accused constituted a clear case of organized crime aimed at instilling fear and demanding protection money, which falls within the ambit of TADA. The appeal by the accused was dismissed, affirming the lower court's judgment and the sentences imposed.

Babu Kuttan R.Pillai & Anr vs State Of Maharashtra · Niyam