Har Narain Daga vs Heeralal & Others

The Supreme Court upheld the eviction of the tenant under Section 13(1)(h) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950, affirming the lower courts' findings of the landlord's bona fide personal necessity for the premises. The Court noted that the question of comparative hardship under Section 14 was properly considered, and the landlord's need for the room for residential use and private coaching outweighed the tenant's commercial use. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the eviction order.