Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-12-01

M.G. Badappanavar And Anr. Etc vs State Of Karnataka And Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2001 SUPREME COURT 260
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M.G. Badappanavar And Anr. Etc
Respondent
State Of Karnataka And Ors
Author
M. Jagannadha Rao
Bench
M. Jagannadha Rao, M.B. Shah, R.P. Sethi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal erred in its interpretation of seniority rules under Article 16(1) & (4) and the Karnataka Government Servants (Seniority) Rules, 1957. The Court reaffirmed the principles established in Ajit Singh II v. State of Punjab, [1999] 7 SCC 209, stating that general candidates should not be denied seniority over reserved candidates who were promoted earlier at roster points. The appeals were allowed, and the Tribunal's decision was set aside, ensuring compliance with the established legal principles regarding seniority.

M.G. Badappanavar And Anr. Etc vs State Of Karnataka And Ors · Niyam