Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-12-15

S.K. Sundaram vs Unknown

Citation / case number
2001(1)ALD(CRI)222
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
S.K. Sundaram
Respondent
Unknown
Author
K.T. Thomas
Bench
K.T. Thomas, R.P. Sethi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court reiterated that contempt of court jurisdiction is aimed at protecting the administration of justice rather than individual judges, referencing the case of Supreme Court Bar Association v. Union of India. The Court found that the telegram sent by S.K. Sundaram, which accused the Chief Justice of India of various offences under Sections 420, 406, 466, 468, and 471 IPC, constituted gross contempt of court. Consequently, the Court issued a notice to the contemnor, affirming the need to uphold the dignity of the judiciary.

S.K. Sundaram vs Unknown · Niyam