Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-08-24

Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Ravaban B. Mistry

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2000 SC 763
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Respondent
Ravaban B. Mistry
Bench
S.P. Bharucha, Ruma Pal

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the income of the husband, as the karta of the Hindu undivided family in the firm of Morvi Time Company, is not liable to be included in the income of the assessee under Section 64 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court referenced the Constitution Bench decision in CIT v. Om Prakash, which established that such income is not taxable in the hands of the wife. Consequently, the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed with no order as to costs.

Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Ravaban B. Mistry · Niyam