Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-08-11

Chandragouda And Anr. vs Shekharagouda S. Pittanagoudar (Dead) ...

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2000 SC 419
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Chandragouda And Anr.
Respondent
Shekharagouda S. Pittanagoudar (Dead) ...
Bench
K.T. Thomas, R.P. Sethi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in not formulating a substantial question of law as mandated by Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC) before proceeding with the second appeal. The Court emphasized that the formulation of such a question is essential for the exercise of jurisdiction under Section 100 CPC. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the case was remanded to the High Court for fresh disposal in accordance with law, maintaining the status quo in the interim.

Chandragouda And Anr. vs Shekharagouda S. Pittanagoudar (Dead) ... · Niyam