Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-08-03

Sayed Taher Bawamiya vs Joint Secretary To The Govt. Of India And ...

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2000 SC 184
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Sayed Taher Bawamiya
Respondent
Joint Secretary To The Govt. Of India And ...
Bench
B.N. Kirpal, Ruma Pal

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Bombay High Court's decision not to entertain a writ petition under Article 226, citing the precedent in Addl. Secy, to the Govt. of India v. Alka Subhash Gadia. The Court established that discretionary jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 32 is limited to specific exceptions, which were not met in this case. The appeal and writ petition were dismissed as the proposed detenu had not surrendered and the detention order had not been served, thus lacking the necessary grounds for judicial intervention.

Sayed Taher Bawamiya vs Joint Secretary To The Govt. Of India And ... · Niyam