Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-08-30

M.C. Mehta vs Union Of India (Re Shifting Of ...

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2000 SC 142
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M.C. Mehta
Respondent
Union Of India (Re Shifting Of ...
Bench
B.N. Kirpal, Ruma Pal

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court reiterated the necessity of compliance with its earlier orders regarding the relocation of industries operating in residential areas as per the Master Plan. The Court emphasized that despite multiple directives since April 1996, the Government of N.C.T. of Delhi failed to ensure the relocation of non-conforming industries, which posed health hazards. The Court rejected the Government's request for an extension to March 2004, reaffirming that all such industries must cease operations by 31st December 1999 if not relocated, thereby upholding public health and safety standards.

M.C. Mehta vs Union Of India (Re Shifting Of ... · Niyam