Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-08-01

State Of Maharashtra & Ors vs Santosh Shankar Acharya

Citation / case number
2000 SCC (CRI) 1400
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of Maharashtra & Ors
Respondent
Santosh Shankar Acharya
Bench
G.B. PATTANAIK, J. UMESH C. BANERJEE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that failure to inform a detenu of their right to make a representation to the Detaining Authority under sub-section (2) of Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Boot-leggers, Drugs Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981, constitutes a violation of Article 22(5) of the Constitution. The Court affirmed the Full Bench of the Bombay High Court's decision that such failure invalidates the detention order. The Court emphasized that the detaining authority retains the power to entertain representations until the order is approved by the State Government as per sub-section (3) of Section 3 of the Act.

State Of Maharashtra & Ors vs Santosh Shankar Acharya · Niyam