U.O.I. vs CHARANJIT S. GILL

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to quash the General Court Martial (GCM) proceedings against the respondent, finding that the Judge Advocate was lower in rank than the accused, violating the provisions of the Army Act. The Court clarified that the quashing of the GCM proceedings does not preclude the authorities from initiating fresh proceedings in accordance with the law. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to the hierarchy and procedural requirements under the Army Act, particularly Sections 39(1) and 63.