Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-04-28

M.C. Mehta vs Union Of India And Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2000 SUPREME COURT 2701
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M.C. Mehta
Respondent
Union Of India And Ors
Bench
B.N. Kirpal, Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court reiterated the directives from M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, [1996] 4 SCC 351, mandating the relocation of hazardous and large industries in Delhi as per the Master Plan. The Court held that the land vacated by these industries must be utilized according to specific percentages for green belts and development by the owners, emphasizing compliance with the Master Plan's zoning regulations. The Court clarified that the surrender of land should not be interpreted as requiring compensation under Section 15 of the Delhi Development Act, thus reinforcing the obligation of industries to surrender excess land without cost.

M.C. Mehta vs Union Of India And Ors · Niyam