Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-04-28

Liaq Ahmed & Ors vs Shri Habeeb-Ur-Rehman

Citation / case number
AIR 2000 SUPREME COURT 2470
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Liaq Ahmed & Ors
Respondent
Shri Habeeb-Ur-Rehman
Bench
S. Saghir Ahmad, R.P. Sethi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court emphasized that rent control legislation, such as the Delhi Rent Control Act, is designed to balance the rights of landlords and tenants, preventing unjust eviction based on technicalities. The Court reiterated the principles established in Mangat Ram vs. Kedar Nath, asserting that the provisions of the Rent Acts should not be interpreted in a hyper-technical manner, as this could undermine their protective purpose for tenants. The Court held that eviction can only be ordered on specified grounds under Section 14 of the Act, reinforcing the need for a rational approach in interpreting these laws to promote social justice.

Liaq Ahmed & Ors vs Shri Habeeb-Ur-Rehman · Niyam