Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-04-11

Edward Keventer Pvt. Ltd vs Bihar State Agricultural Marketing ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2000 SUPREME COURT 1796
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Edward Keventer Pvt. Ltd
Respondent
Bihar State Agricultural Marketing ...
Author
V.N.Khare
Bench
V.N.Khare, Doraiswami Raju

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined whether the fruit drinks 'Frooti' and 'Appy' fall under the definition of 'agricultural produce' as per the Bihar Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1960, specifically under Section 2(l)(a). The Court held that the products, being derived from mango and apple, do not qualify as agricultural produce since they are processed beverages and not raw fruits. Consequently, the demand for market fees on these products was deemed invalid, leading to the dismissal of the respondents' notice and upholding the appellant's challenge under Article 226 of the Constitution.

Edward Keventer Pvt. Ltd vs Bihar State Agricultural Marketing ... · Niyam