Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-04-05

Kantilal Hirji Shah vs State Of Tamil Nadu And Ors.

Citation / case number
2001CRILJ145
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Kantilal Hirji Shah
Respondent
State Of Tamil Nadu And Ors.
Author
Doraiswamy Raju
Bench
Doraiswamy Raju

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the delay in the disposal of the detenu's representation violated Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India, which mandates that a representation against detention must be considered expeditiously. The Court emphasized that the representation should have been placed directly before the Secretary of the Ministry of Finance, as per the delegation of powers under Section 11 of the COFEPOSA Act. The Court found that the representation was not handled promptly, leading to a breach of constitutional rights, and thus ruled in favor of the petitioner.

Kantilal Hirji Shah vs State Of Tamil Nadu And Ors. · Niyam