RAJ DEO SHARMA vs THE STATE OF BIHAR

The Supreme Court clarified that the petition was for modification and clarification of its previous directions regarding speedy trials, not a review of the main judgment. The Court emphasized the right to a speedy trial, referencing guidelines established in the Antulay case (1992 (1) SCC 225), which state that while no strict time limits can be imposed, delays infringing on this right may lead to quashing of charges or convictions. The Court held that subordinate courts must interpret its directions correctly to ensure justice is served without misapprehension of the guidelines.