Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 1999

Supreme Court of India · 1999-01-27

RAJNI BALA AGRAWAL vs LALIT NARAIN MITHILA UNIV.

Citation / case number
SC 1992/84109
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RAJNI BALA AGRAWAL
Respondent
LALIT NARAIN MITHILA UNIV.
Author
G.B.Pattanaik Sujata V. Manohar
Bench
G.B.Pattanaik Sujata V. Manohar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that the appointment of the appellant as Principal of Mahila Mahavidalaya was invalid due to the lack of concurrence from the Bihar College Service Commission as mandated by the Bihar State Universities Act, 1976, specifically Section 4(14). The Court emphasized that without such concurrence, the appellant could not claim the position of Principal despite her long tenure. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the decision of the Patna High Court that the appellant was only a Lecturer and not entitled to the benefits of the Principal's post.

RAJNI BALA AGRAWAL vs LALIT NARAIN MITHILA UNIV. · Niyam