Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 1999

Supreme Court of India · 1999-02-03

V.S.PALANICHAMY vs C. ALAGAPPAN

Citation / case number
SC 1998/5068
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
V.S.PALANICHAMY
Respondent
C. ALAGAPPAN
Author
D.P.WADHWA S.SAGHIR AHMAD
Bench
D.P.WADHWA S.SAGHIR AHMAD

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed appeals concerning the execution of decrees for specific performance under the Specific Relief Act, 1963, particularly Section 16. The Court held that the executing court has the authority to extend the time for deposit of the balance consideration, as established in Sardar Mohar Singh v. Mangilal (1997). The Court affirmed the High Court's decision to remit the matter back to the executing court for proper adjudication, thereby allowing the decree-holders to seek an extension despite the delay in compliance with the decree's terms.

V.S.PALANICHAMY vs C. ALAGAPPAN · Niyam