Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 1999

Supreme Court of India · 1999-12-15

H.C.OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD THRO REG. vs SARNAM SINGH

Citation / case number
SC 1998/12583
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
H.C.OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD THRO REG.
Respondent
SARNAM SINGH
Author
SAGHIR AHMAD
Bench
D.P.WADHWA S.SAGHIR AHMAD

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that the increase in the retirement age for subordinate judicial officers to 60 years, as directed in All India Judges’ Association vs. Union of India, is not automatic and requires assessment of the officer's past service record and potential for continued utility. The Court emphasized that only those deemed fit by the respective High Courts should benefit from this increase, while others should be compulsorily retired at 58 years. The judgment clarifies the procedural requirements for such evaluations, ensuring that the integrity and performance of judicial officers are adequately considered before extending their service.

H.C.OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD THRO REG. vs SARNAM SINGH · Niyam