Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 1999

Supreme Court of India · 1999-12-07

M/S.HYDERABAD ASBESTOS CEMENT vs UNION OF INDIA

Citation / case number
SC 1987/68203
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S.HYDERABAD ASBESTOS CEMENT
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA
Author
S.P.BHARUCHA,R.C.LAHOTI,N.S HEGDE
Bench
S.P.BHARUCHA,R.C.LAHOTI,N.S HEGDE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the applicability of Rule 56A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, concerning the proforma credit procedure for excise duty on raw materials used in manufacturing finished products. The Court held that the benefit of proforma credit is available even if the raw materials are excisable under different tariff items than the finished products, thereby allowing the appellants to claim credit for duties paid on inputs. The decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court was overturned, affirming the appellants' entitlement to the credit under the specified rule.

M/S.HYDERABAD ASBESTOS CEMENT vs UNION OF INDIA · Niyam