Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 1999

Supreme Court of India · 1999-08-18

COLGATE PALMOLIVE (INDIA) LTD. vs HINDUSTAN LEVER LTD.

Citation / case number
SC 1998/7597
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COLGATE PALMOLIVE (INDIA) LTD.
Respondent
HINDUSTAN LEVER LTD.
Author
UMESH C. BANERJEE B.N.KIRPAL
Bench
UMESH C. BANERJEE B.N.KIRPAL

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed appeals under Section 55 of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act (MRTP Act) concerning the Commission's orders related to Colgate Palmolive's advertising practices. The Court emphasized that Section 12A of the MRTP Act empowers the Commission to grant temporary injunctions during inquiries, a power introduced by the MRTP Amendment Act 1984. The Court upheld the Commission's authority to issue such injunctions, affirming the need for regulatory oversight in preventing monopolistic and unfair trade practices.

COLGATE PALMOLIVE (INDIA) LTD. vs HINDUSTAN LEVER LTD. · Niyam