Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 1999

Supreme Court of India · 1999-08-30

SHIV KUMAR vs HUKAM CHAND

Citation / case number
SC 1997/61624
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SHIV KUMAR
Respondent
HUKAM CHAND
Author
S.P.KURDUKAR,K.T.THOMAS,N.SANTOSH HEGDE
Bench
S.P.KURDUKAR,K.T.THOMAS,N.SANTOSH HEGDE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 301(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.), a private counsel cannot conduct prosecution in a sessions trial without the Public Prosecutor's direction. The Court emphasized the importance of fairness to the accused in criminal proceedings, affirming that the Public Prosecutor must retain control over the prosecution. The High Court's order allowing a private counsel to assist under the Public Prosecutor's guidance was upheld, ensuring the integrity of the prosecution process.

SHIV KUMAR vs HUKAM CHAND · Niyam