Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 1998

Supreme Court of India · 1998-09-22

ARUL NADAR vs AUTHORISED OFFICER, LAND REFORMS

Citation / case number
SC 1991/80248
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
ARUL NADAR
Respondent
AUTHORISED OFFICER, LAND REFORMS
Author
G.B. PATTANAIK
Bench
M.M. PUNCHHI,G.B.PATTANAIK,AND A.P. MISRA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the applicability of Section 21-A of the Tamil Nadu Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling on Land) Act, 1961, in the context of a landowner's appeal regarding surplus land determination. The Court held that the provisions of Section 21-A, introduced by Tamil Nadu Act XVII of 1970, do not apply to proceedings initiated under the Principal Act, thus affirming the High Court's dismissal of the appellant's revision. The ruling clarified that the non-obstante clause in Section 21-A does not retroactively affect prior proceedings initiated under the original Act.

ARUL NADAR vs AUTHORISED OFFICER, LAND REFORMS · Niyam