U.O.I. vs P. THAYAGARAJAN

The Supreme Court addressed the procedural validity of disciplinary actions under the CRPF Act, 1949, specifically Sections 11(1) and 12(1). The Court held that the Disciplinary Authority has the power to remit matters for further inquiry, and the use of 'de novo' does not alter this authority's scope. The Court overturned the High Court's decision which had set aside the Disciplinary Authority's order for a fresh inquiry, affirming that the authority acted within its rights under the rules.