Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 1998

Supreme Court of India · 1998-11-17

MAROTI & ORS. vs DEVRAO & ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 1994/77592
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MAROTI & ORS.
Respondent
DEVRAO & ORS.
Author
G.B. PATTANAIK. SUJATA V. MANOHAR
Bench
G.B. PATTANAIK. SUJATA V. MANOHAR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed a dispute regarding protected tenancy under the Hyderabad Tenancy & Agricultural Lands Act, 1950, specifically examining the implications of Section 34 and Section 37A. The Court held that the rights of the respondent Dadarao as a protected tenant were not extinguished by the appellant Nivrutti's claim under Section 37A, as the respondent had a valid protected tenancy certificate. The matter was remanded to the Tahsildar for determination of the rights of both parties regarding the land in question, with no order as to costs.

MAROTI & ORS. vs DEVRAO & ORS. · Niyam