Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 1998

Supreme Court of India · 1998-03-27

D1MAIN vs D1MAIN

Citation / case number
SC 1992/86100
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
D1MAIN
Respondent
D1MAIN
Author
K.T. THOMAS S. RAJENDRA BABU
Bench
K.T. THOMAS S. RAJENDRA BABU

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision in Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay vs. Nagpal Printing Mills, affirming that the Municipal Corporation can only levy water charges based on actual consumption as per Section 141 and Section 169 of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. The Court found no reason to reconsider the Nagpal case, emphasizing that the previous rule was invalid due to lack of guidelines. The High Court's order for refund of amounts was upheld, with stipulations regarding amounts already refunded or retained by the Corporation.

D1MAIN vs D1MAIN · Niyam