Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 1998

Supreme Court of India · 1998-02-19

CHHIDDA SINGH vs DY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION

Citation / case number
SC 1997/18921
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
CHHIDDA SINGH
Respondent
DY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION
Author
K. VENKATASWAMI A.S. ANAND
Bench
K. VENKATASWAMI A.S. ANAND

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court dismissed the review petition, emphasizing that the grounds presented were identical to those in the special leave petition, indicating a lack of diligence. The Court reiterated that the order of the Settlement Officer Consolidation, which attained finality under Section 21(2) of the C.H. Act, should not have been disturbed by the Dv. Director of Consolidation, as their powers under Section 48 are limited. The Court held that the Dv. Director acted without jurisdiction, and the review petition was rejected due to its frivolous nature.

CHHIDDA SINGH vs DY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION · Niyam