Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 1998

Supreme Court of India · 1998-02-17

K.URMILA vs RAJ KUMAR VERMA

Citation / case number
SC 1997/10696
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
K.URMILA
Respondent
RAJ KUMAR VERMA
Author
M. JAGANNADHA RAO S. SAGHIR A HMAD
Bench
M. JAGANNADHA RAO S. SAGHIR A HMAD

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in reversing the concurrent findings of the Rent Controller and the appellate authority regarding the landlord's bonafide requirement for eviction under the relevant tenancy laws. The Court emphasized that the High Court should have considered the evidence presented by the lower courts before concluding that the landlord's requirement was established. Consequently, the Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment and remanded the case for reconsideration in accordance with law.

K.URMILA vs RAJ KUMAR VERMA · Niyam