M.H. DEVENDRAPPA vs THE KARNATAKA STATE SMALL INDUSTRIESDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

The Supreme Court held that the disciplinary action taken against the appellant, an Assistant Manager of KSSIDC, for writing a letter to the Governor alleging mismanagement and corruption was justified under Rule 22 of the Service Rules. The Court emphasized that employees have a duty to maintain confidentiality and loyalty to their employer, and public criticism can lead to disciplinary measures. The Court upheld the dismissal of the appellant, affirming that his actions were detrimental to the interests of the Corporation.