Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 1998

Supreme Court of India · 1998-08-05

REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER vs A ARUNA

Citation / case number
SC 1997/3930
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER
Respondent
A ARUNA
Author
S.N. PHUKAN G.T. NANAVATI
Bench
S.N. PHUKAN G.T. NANAVATI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the appeal concerning the A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982, where the appellants challenged the High Court's ruling that denied their review petition. The Court held that the review jurisdiction was improperly invoked, affirming the High Court's decision that the evidence presented (Ex. B-12) was admissible and that the earlier judgment was based on sound factual grounds. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, upholding the High Court's order and the Special Court's findings regarding the title of the land in question.

REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER vs A ARUNA · Niyam