Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 1998

Supreme Court of India · 1998-08-05

BRIJ BHUSHAN vs KEWAL KUMAR

Citation / case number
SC 1997/15870
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BRIJ BHUSHAN
Respondent
KEWAL KUMAR
Author
B.N. KIRPAL. V.N. KHARE A.S. ANAND
Bench
B.N. KIRPAL. V.N. KHARE A.S. ANAND

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the validity of a rent deposit made under Section 6A of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973. The Court held that the tenant's deposit of arrears was valid as the landlord had refused to accept rent and issue receipts, thus justifying the tenant's action under Section 6A. The Court upheld the appellate authority's decision, reversing the Rent Controller's order of ejectment against the tenant.

BRIJ BHUSHAN vs KEWAL KUMAR · Niyam