Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 1997

Supreme Court of India · 1997-09-01

C.S.I.R., NEW DELHI vs M.V. SASTRY

Citation / case number
SC 1994/72344
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
C.S.I.R., NEW DELHI
Respondent
M.V. SASTRY
Author
Sujata V. Manohar
Bench
M. JAGANNADHA RAO SUJATA V. MANOHAR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the application of Rule 30 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, concerning the addition of qualifying service for pension computation. The Court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal's decision to grant the respondent the benefit of Rule 30, emphasizing that the respondent's prior service should be considered for pension purposes. The appeal by the appellants was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal's order without awarding interest to the respondent.

C.S.I.R., NEW DELHI vs M.V. SASTRY · Niyam