Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 1997

Supreme Court of India · 1997-10-03

GRAM PANCHAYAT KAKRAN vs ADDL DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION

Citation / case number
SC 1997/2947
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
GRAM PANCHAYAT KAKRAN
Respondent
ADDL DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION
Author
D.P. WADHWA SUJATA V. MANOHAR
Bench
D.P. WADHWA SUJATA V. MANOHAR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the application of Section 42 of the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948, regarding the reopening of repartition after a significant delay. The Court held that the provisions under Rule 18 of the East Punjab Holding (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Rules, 1949, which impose a six-month limitation for filing applications, are applicable to orders made under the Act. The Court dismissed the appeal of the Gram Panchayat, affirming the decision of the Additional Director, Consolidation, allowing the second respondent's application for repartition despite the delay.

GRAM PANCHAYAT KAKRAN vs ADDL DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION · Niyam