Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 1997

Supreme Court of India · 1997-01-24

SWASTIC INDUSTRIES vs MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY BD.

Citation / case number
SC 1997/60963
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SWASTIC INDUSTRIES
Respondent
MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY BD.
Author
G.T. NANAVATI K. RAMASWAMY
Bench
G.T. NANAVATI K. RAMASWAMY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the National Consumers’ Disputes Redressal Commission, affirming that there is no limitation period for issuing a supplementary bill under Section 24 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910. The Court clarified that Section 60-A of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948, which prescribes a 3-year limitation for recovery suits, does not apply to the Board's power to issue supplementary bills. The Court held that the Electricity Board is entitled to demand payment for electricity supplied, and the appeal by the Electricity Board was allowed.

SWASTIC INDUSTRIES vs MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY BD. · Niyam